Monday , October 23, 2017 |   00:24:38 IST
INTL TAXATION INTL MISC TP FDI LIBRARY VISA BIPA NRI
About Us Contact Us Instant Updates Newsletters
 
NEWS FLASH
 
TP - While evaluating ALP, TPO is not permitted to seek justification from Assessee regarding receipt of benefits in lieu of services offered to its AEs: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') TP - Filter adopted for purpose of selecting comparables, should be applied equally to all companies, for benchmarking: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') TP - Assessee should be allowed to withdraw appeal, if dispute in appeal is subject matter of Unilateral Advanced Pricing Agreement entered into with CBDT: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') TP - Expenses incurred in foreign currency are to reduced equally from export turnover as well as total turnover, for purpose of deduction u/s 10A: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') Tax administrators, OECD focus on BEPS implementation at regional meeting (See 'TII Brief') Private pension assets scale new high in 2016 (See 'TII Brief') TP - Functionally different companies cannot be compared, in absence of segmental results for comparing profit ratio from product and services: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') TP - Appeal which is filed by completely misconstruing the facts, is not maintenable: ITAT (See 'Breaking News' TP - Resale price method is most appropriate, where Assessee buys goods from AE and resells to network of distributors through Franchisees, without any value addition: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') I-T - Overseas payments made for purchasing software licenses, are liable for TDS deduction, failure of which will attract interest u/s 201: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') TP - No writ interference is warranted on issue of selection of comparables, when ITAT being last fact finding authority has given cogent reasons for same: HC (See 'Breaking News') TP - When benefit of capital adjustment is given to Assessee, then same should also be taken into account while determining profit margin in case of comparables: ITAT (See 'Breaking News) I-T - Expenses incurred in foreign currency towards rendering technical services outside India, had to be excluded from both export turnover as well as total turnover: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') I-T - Failure of amalgamated company to challenge passing of order in name of merged company by way of raising specific ground, cannot be attributed on part of Authority: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') Over 100 preferential tax regimes dismantled across world: OECD (See 'TII Brief')
 
TII SEARCH
 
 
   
Home >>
 

CBDT notifies India-Vietnam Protocol
By TII News Service
Sep 04, 2017 , New Delhi

    

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
NEW DELHI

NOTIFICATION NO

82/2017, Dated: August 30, 2017

S.O. 2826(E).-Whereas the Protocol amending the Agreement, signed at Ha Noi on the 7th day of September, 1994, between the Government of the Republic of India and the Government of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income, was signed at Ha Noi, Viet Nam on the 3rd day of September, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the "the said Protocol");

And whereas the date of entry into force of the said Protocol is the 21st day of February, 2017, being the date of the later of the notifications of the completion of domestic requirements for the entry into force of the said Protocol, in accordance with Article 3 of the said Protocol;

Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 90 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby notifies that all the provisions of the said Protocol, as set out in the Annexure hereto, shall be given effect to in the Union of India.

[F.No.503/5/2009-FTD-II]

(Rajat Bansal)
Jt Secy

ANNEXURE

PROTOCOL AMENDING

THE AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA

THE GOVERNMENT OF THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIET NAM

FOR THE

AVOIDANCE OF DOUBLE TAXATION

AND THE

PREVENTION OF FISCAL EVASION

WITH

RESPECT TO TAXES ON INCOME

The Government of the Republic of India and the Government of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam,

Desiring to amend the Agreement between the Government of the Republic of India and the Government of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income signed at HaNoi on the 7th day of September, 1994 (in this Protocol referred to as "the Agreement"),

Have agreed as follows:

Article 1

The text of Article 27 of the Agreement is deleted and replaced by the following:

"Article 27

EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION

1. The competent authorities of the Contracting States shall exchange such information (including documents) as is necessary for carrying out the provisions of the Agreement or of the domestic laws of the Contracting States concerning taxes covered by the agreement, insofar as the taxation thereunder is not contrary to the Agreement, in particular for the prevention of fraud or evasion of such taxes. Any information received by a Contracting State shall be treated as secret in the same manner as information obtained under the domestic laws of the State. However, if the information is originally regarded as secret in the transmitting State, it shall be disclosed only to persons or authorities (including courts and administrative bodies) involved in the assessment or collection of, the enforcement or prosecution in respect of, or the determination of appeals in relation to, the taxes which are the subject of the Agreement. Such persons or authorities shall use the information only for such purposes but may disclose the information in public court proceedings or in judicial decisions. The competent authorities shall, through consultation, develop appropriate conditions, methods and techniques concerning the matters in respect of which such exchange of information shall be made, including, where appropriate, exchange of information regarding tax avoidance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, information received by a Contracting State may be used for other purposes when such information may be used for such other purposes under the laws of both States and the competent authority of the supplying State authorises such use.

2. The exchange of information or documents shall be either on a routine basis or on request with reference to particular cases or both. The competent authorities of the Contracting States shall agree from time to time on the list of the information or documents which shall be furnished on a routine basis.

3. In no case shall the provisions of paragraph 1 be construed so as to impose on a Contracting State the obligation:

(a) to carry out administrative measures at variance with the laws or administrative practice of that or of the other Contracting State;

(b) to supply information or documents which are not obtainable under the laws or in the normal course of the administration of that or of the other Contracting State;

(c) to supply information or documents which would disclose any trade, business, industrial, commercial or professional secret of trade process of information the disclosure of which would be contrary to public policy.

4. If information is requested by a Contracting State in accordance with this Article, the other Contracting State shall use its information gathering measures to obtain the requested information, even though that other State may not need such information for its own tax purposes. The obligation contained in the preceding sentence is subject to the limitations of paragraph 3 but in no case shall such limitations be construed to permit a Contracting State to decline to supply information solely because it has no domestic interest in such information.

5. In no case shall the provisions of paragraph 3 be construed to permit a Contracting State to decline to supply information solely because the information is held by a bank, other financial institution, nominee or person acting in an agency or a fiduciary capacity or because it relates to ownership interests in a person."

Article 2

A new Article 27A of the Agreement shall be inserted:

"Article 27A

ASSISTANCE IN THE COLLECTION OF TAXES

1. The Contracting States shall lend assistance to each other in the collection of revenue claims. This assistance is not restricted by Articles 1 and 2. The competent authorities of the Contracting States may by mutual agreement settle the mode of application of this Article.

2. The term "revenue claim" as used in this Article means an amount owed in respect of taxes of every kind and description imposed on behalf of the Contracting States, or of their political subdivisions or local authorities, insofar as the taxation thereunder is not contrary to this Agreement or any other instrument to which the Contracting States are parties, as well as interest, administrative penalties and costs of collection or conservancy related to such amount.

3. When a revenue claim of a Contracting State is enforceable under the laws of that State and is owed by a person who, at that time, cannot, under the laws of that State, prevent its collection, that revenue claim shall, at the request of the competent authority of that State, be accepted for purposes of collection by the competent authority of the other Contracting State. That revenue claim shall be collected by that other State in accordance with the provisions of its laws applicable to the enforcement and collection of its own taxes as if the revenue claim were a revenue claim of that other State.

4. When a revenue claim of a Contracting State is a claim in respect of which that State may, under its law, take measures of conservancy with a view to ensure its collection, that revenue claim shall, at the request of the competent authority of that State, be accepted for purposes of taking measures of conservancy by the competent authority of the other Contracting State. That other State shall take measures of conservancy in respect of that revenue claim in accordance with the provisions of its laws as if the revenue claim were a revenue claim of that other State even if, at the time when such measures are applied, the revenue claim is not enforceable in the first-mentioned State or is owed by a person who has a right to prevent its collection.

5. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs 3 and 4, a revenue claim accepted by a Contracting State for purposes of paragraph 3 or 4 shall not, in that State, be subject to the time limits or accorded any priority applicable to a revenue claim under the laws of that State by reason of its nature as such. In addition, a revenue claim accepted by a Contracting State for the purposes of paragraph 3 or 4 shall not, in that State, have any priority applicable to that revenue claim under the laws of the other Contracting State.

6. Proceedings with respect to the existence, validity or the amount of a revenue claim of a Contracting State shall not be brought before the courts or administrative bodies of the other Contracting State.

7. Where, at any time after a request has been made by a Contracting State under paragraph 3 or 4 and before the other Contracting State has collected and remitted the relevant revenue claim to the first-mentioned State, the relevant revenue claim ceases to be

(a) in the case of a request under paragraph 3, a revenue claim of the first-mentioned State that is enforceable under the laws of that State and is owed by a person who, at that time, cannot, under the laws of that State, prevent its collection, or

(b) in the case of a request under paragraph 4, a revenue claim of the first-mentioned State in respect of which that State may, under its laws, take measures of conservancy with a view to ensure its collection

the competent authority of the first-mentioned State shall promptly notify the competent authority of the other State of that fact and, at the option of the other State, the first-mentioned State shall either suspend or withdraw its request.

8. In no case shall the provisions of this Article be construed so as to impose on a Contracting State the obligation:

(a) to carry out administrative measures at variance with the laws and administrative practice of that or of the other Contracting State;

(b) to carry out measures which would be contrary to public policy (order public);

(c) to provide assistance if the other Contracting State has not pursued all reasonable measures of collection or conservancy, as the case may be, available under its laws or administrative practice;

(d) to provide assistance in those cases where the administrative burden for that State is clearly disproportionate to the benefit to be derived by the other Contracting State.".

Article 3

The Contracting States shall notify each other in writing through diplomatic channel of the completion of their domestic requirements for the entry into force of this Protocol. The Protocol shall enter into force on the date of the later of these notifications.

Article 4

The Protocol, which shall form an integral part of the Agreement, shall remain in force as long as the Agreement remains in force and shall apply as long as the Agreement itself is applicable.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned, duly authorised, have signed this Protocol.

DONE in duplicate at Ha Noi, on this 3rd day of September, 2016, in English, Hindi and Vietnamese languages, all texts being equally authentic. In case of divergence of interpretation, the English text shall prevail.

FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA
FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIET NAM
(Parvathaneni Harish)
Ambassador Extraordinary and
Plenipotentiary Republic of India to S.R. Vietnam
(Do Hoang Anh Tuan)
Vice Minister of Ministry of Finance.
 
 
gmail login
INTL TAXATION INTL MISC TP FDI LIBRARY VISA BIPA NRI TII
  • DTAAs
  • TIEAs
  • Circulars (I-T Act, 1922)
  • Circulars
  • Instructions
  • DRP Panel
  • Administrative Orders
  • Notifications
  • I-T Act, 1961
  • Relevant Portion of I-T Rules,1962
  • Relevant Portion of I-T Act,1922
  • GAAR
  • Equalisation Levy
  • Draft Guidelines
  • Committee Reports
  • FATCA
  • Intl-Taxation
  • Finance Acts
  • Manual on EoI
  • DTC Bill
  • UN Model
  • Miscellaneous
  • Guidance Notes - AEOI
  • OECD Conventions
  • Cost Inflation Index
  • Union Budget
  • Information Security Guidelines
  • Circulars
  • Instructions
  • Notifications
  • Relevant Sections of Act
  • TP Rules
  • Forms
  • Miscellaneous
  • APA Annual Report
  • APA Rules
  • APA FAQ
  • UN Manual on TP
  • Safe Harbour Rules
  • US Transfer Pricing
  • FEMA Act
  • Exchange Manual
  • Fema Notifications
  • Master Circulars
  • Press Notes
  • Rules
  • RBI Circulars
  • FDI Circulars
  • Reports
  • FDI Approved
  • RBI Other Notifications
  • FIPB Review
  • Black Money Act
  • PMLA Notification
  • PMLA Instruction
  • PMLA Bill
  • FM Budget Speeches
  • SEBI
  • Multimodal Transportation
  • Vienna Convention
  • NBFC Reports
  • EXIM Bank LoC
  • Manufacturing Policy
  • FTDR Act, 1992
  • Intellectual Property
  • White Paper on Black Money
  • Posting Policy
  • PMLA Cases
  • Transfer of Property
  • CBR Act, 1963
  • MCA Circular
  • Book Review
  • Limitation Act
  • SSAs
  • EPFO
  • FAQs
  • Acts
  • Rules
  • Guidelines
  • Tourist Visa
  • Notifcations
  • Types of Visa
  • Agreements
  • Arbitration
  • Model Text
  • Relevant Portion of I-T Act
  • Circulars
  • I-T Rules, 1962
  • MISC
  • Notifications
  • Subscribe
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  •  
     
    A Taxindiaonline Website. Copyright © 2016 Taxindiainternational.com Pvt.Ltd. All rights reserved. | Powered by 4th Dimension