Monday , October 14, 2019 |   04:37:12 IST
INTL TAXATION INTL MISC TP LIBRARY VISA BIPA NRI
About Us Contact Us Newsletters
 
NEWS FLASH
 
TP - Adjustments are to be added to unadjusted operating margin of comparables to identify margin compared would have earned had it been operating with similar working capital position as tested party: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') TP - Loss making comparables that satisfy comparability analysis should not be rejected on sole basis that they suffer losses: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') TP - Government companies are generally unfit for purposes of comparison against private companies driven by profit motive: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') Carbon taxes to help generate more revenue: IMF chief (See 'Brief') TP - TPO should adopt portfolio approach to take both prices that are favourable as well as adverse, in case there is fluctuation in price of same product: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') TP - Disposal of objections by passing of speaking order is indispensable, before passing re assessment order: HC (See 'Breaking News') TP - Investment advisory company should not be compared to merchant banker for purposes of benchmarking: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') I-T - Managerial fees paid overseas without making available any technical knowhow to recipient, does not amount to 'FTS/Royalty' and hence does not attract withholding tax liability: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') EU officially removes Switzerland from blacklist of tax havens Indian GST - Flaw in Design - 'Hurricane Katrina' in the making! (See 'The Cob(Web)' in TIOL) TP - ALP of support services can be determined at NIL, if cost allocation between AEs was on 'Per user' basis without any mark up: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') TP - LIBOR rates should be adopted to benchmark receipt of interest from overseas AEs on advances made to them: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') TP - 'Quantum of expenditure' & 'bright line test' are no basis to conclude 'AMP expenditure' within meaning of 'international transaction' u/s 92B: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') I-T - Revenue once having accepted that non-resident service providers did not receive any income in view of respective DTAA, the occasion to deduct tax at source would not arise: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') TP - Mere fact that taxpayer entity had included an entity in list of comparables, would not bar them from contending otherwise before TPO: HC (See 'Breaking News') TP - Adoption of comparables without any proper reasoning and cryptic order, calls for re-adjudication: ITAT (See 'Breaking News') TP - No penalty u/s 271G is imposable, if peculiar nature of product & constant mixing of diamonds obtained from AEs & non-AEs, renders it difficult to determine segmental profitability to work out internal TNMM: ITAT (See 'Breaking News')
 
TII SEARCH
 
 
   
Home >>
 

Sharing of tax information received under DTAA - CBDT reiterates no sharing with CBI & others unless permission taken from tax jurisdiction sending info
By TII News Service
Sep 18, 2019 , New Delhi

    

F.No. 500/163/2017/FT&TR-III

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES
FOREIGN TAX AND TAX RESEARCH DIVISION
NEW DELHI

Dated: September 18, 2019

To,

All Pr. CCsIT/DGsIT(Inv.)/CCsIT/DGsIT

Subject: Instructions on sharing of information received under EOI process of tax treaties to be used for non-tax purposes - regarding.

Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has from time to time issued instructions emphasizing on the confidentiality of information obtained from foreign jurisdictions under the Exchange of Information (EOI) process of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAAs)/ Tax Information Exchange Agreements (TIEAs)/ Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters (MAC) [hereinafter referred to as 'tax treaties'],

2. In this context, it is stated that it is India's sovereign obligation to keep the information obtained through the EOI process of tax treaties with the other jurisdictions confidential. Any disclosure of the information received under tax treaties with unauthorized persons, either intentionally or by accident, is a serious matter. The field authorities are, therefore, required to take all steps to ensure that the information received under tax treaties is not disclosed inappropriately. This is necessary for continued co-operation in the EOI process from our treaty partners.

3. The confidentiality provisions of tax treaties also prohibit the use of exchanged information for non-tax purposes without the express consent of the Competent Authority of the sending jurisdiction. Thus, the information received under tax treaties cannot be used for enforcement of any law other than the laws concerning taxes covered by the relevant tax treaty. The information received can only be shared with any other Law Enforcement Agency (LEA), such as Enforcement Directorate, CBI, etc., after obtaining consent from the Competent Authority of the sending jurisdiction. The field authorities are required to make request for obtaining such consent to the FT&TR Division in the enclosed proforma on a case-to-case basis. The information can be shared with the concerned LEA only after the FT&TR division obtains and conveys the consent of the Competent Authority of the sending jurisdiction for sharing of the treaty exchanged information.

4. These instructions may be brought to the notice of all officers in your region for strict compliance.

5. This issues with the approval of Chairman, CBDT.

(Navneet Manohar)
Director, FT&TR-III

Annexure

Proforma for request to Competent Authorities of Foreign Jurisdictions seeking consent for use of Information received under tax treaties for non-tax purposes

(Separate proforma to be filled for sharing with each Law Enforcement Agency)

 
1.
FT &TR Reference Number of the information to be shared
 
 
2.
Country/Jurisdiction to which request is to be made
 
3.
Indian Individual/Entity under investigation/examination
Name
 
Full Address
 
4.
Law Enforcement Agency (LEA) with whom the information is proposed to be shared
 
5.
Details of Indian Statute(s) for which the information shall be used by the LEA
Details of the statute
Brief description
(i)
 
(ii)
 
6.
Relevant background and grounds for believing that the information would be useful by the LEA
 
7.
Details of information to be shared with the LEA
(i) Reference number and date of
letter of foreign authority vide
which the information received
 
(ii) Number of pages of
information received in paper
 
(iii) Number of files in the CD/USB drive if information received in electronic format
 
8.
Any other comments
 
 
 
 
INTL TAXATION INTL MISC TP LIBRARY VISA BIPA NRI TII
  • DTAA
  • Circulars (I-T Act, 1922)
  • Limited Treaties
  • Other Treaties
  • TIEAs
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Relevant Portion of I-T Rules,1962
  • Instructions
  • Administrative Orders
  • DRP Panel
  • I-T Act, 1961
  • MLI
  • Relevant Portion of I-T Act,1922
  • GAAR
  • Committee Reports
  • FATCA
  • Intl-Taxation
  • Finance Acts
  • Manual on EoI
  • UN Model
  • Miscellaneous
  • Cost Inflation Index
  • Union Budget
  • Information Security Guidelines
  • Relevant Sections of Act
  • Instructions
  • Circulars
  • Notifications
  • Draft Notifications
  • Forms
  • TP Rules
  • APA FAQ
  • UN Manual on TP
  • Safe Harbour Rules
  • US Transfer Pricing
  • Black Money Act
  • PMLA Notification
  • PMLA Instruction
  • PMLA Bill
  • FM Budget Speeches
  • Multimodal Transportation
  • Vienna Convention
  • EXIM Bank LoC
  • Manufacturing Policy
  • FTDR Act, 1992
  • White Paper on Black Money
  • Posting Policy
  • PMLA Cases
  • Transfer of Property
  • MCA Circular
  • Book Review
  • Limitation Act
  • SSAs
  • EPFO
  • Acts
  • FAQs
  • Rules
  • Guidelines
  • Tourist Visa
  • Notifications
  • Agreements
  • I-T Rules, 1962
  • Circulars
  • MISC
  • Notification
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  •  
     
    A Taxindiaonline Website. Copyright © 2010-2019 Taxindiainternational.com Pvt.Ltd. All rights reserved.